zum Inhalt springen

Linguistic reconstruction: Uncovering Qaqet’s family history

Marc Hausdorf; visualisations by Marc Hausdorf, Melanie Schippling

Qaqet is not alone – it is part of a language family. To reconstruct its common ancestor, we start by comparing vocabulary from the different languages and looking for sound correspondences. Find out more about how we reconstructed Proto-Baining on this page. For a list of Proto-Baining roots, click here.

Let’s first consider a straightforward example: The word for ‘mother’ in all Baining languages is nan – we can thus assume that *nan was the Proto-Baining word for ‘mother’, too. Things get a little more interesting when we compare the words for ‘father’: mam in Qaqet, Mali and Ura, but mem in Kairak. Looking at other, similar words, we see that the correspondence of e in Kairak to a in the other Baining languages is not a coincidence, but regular: ‘spiders’ is qumang in Mali and Ura, but qumeng in Kairak; Mali and Ura matka ‘older brother’ correspond to Kairak metka, and so on. From this we infer that there was a sound change in the development of Kairak, where a Proto-Baining a changed to e when it followed an m.

Proto-Baining *nan and its cognate sets in the languages of the Baining family today.
Proto-Baining *mam and its cognate sets in the languages of the Baining family today.

The Baning languages have undergone many different sound changes. Go ahead and explore some of them on the following subpages:

vergrößern:
Overview of the isoglosses introduced on the subpages.

In case you would like to get an immediate overview of some salient sound changes and isoglosses, consider this map (click to enlarge). But beware, it includes a spoiler for each of the subpages linked above. The notation conventions are explained in the side bar.

*